<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Messianic Apologetics &amp; The Virgin Birth (Conception)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jerusalemcouncil.org/articles/apologetics/messianic-jewish-apologetics-virgin-birth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jerusalemcouncil.org/articles/apologetics/messianic-jewish-apologetics-virgin-birth/</link>
	<description>A Global Association of Orthodox Jewish Believers in Messiah Yeshua</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 03:30:37 +0300</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://jerusalemcouncil.org/articles/apologetics/messianic-jewish-apologetics-virgin-birth/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 03:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerusalemcouncil.org/?p=822#comment-725</guid>
		<description>Wow, what a great article. Maybe the best I&#039;ve ever read regarding the Virgin Birth. Would love to see the closed mem of Isaiah 9 brought in.......chazak u&#039;barukh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, what a great article. Maybe the best I&#8217;ve ever read regarding the Virgin Birth. Would love to see the closed mem of Isaiah 9 brought in&#8230;&#8230;.chazak u&#8217;barukh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Kalev Michaels</title>
		<link>http://jerusalemcouncil.org/articles/apologetics/messianic-jewish-apologetics-virgin-birth/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Kalev Michaels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerusalemcouncil.org/?p=822#comment-350</guid>
		<description>But the Rulemaker clearly stated that no natural man would suffice. &quot;A brother does not redeem anyone at all, neither give to Elohim a ransom for him; for the redemption of their lives is costly, and it shall cease forever; that he should still live forever, and not see the Pit.&quot;[Tehilla/Psalm 49:7-9] Careful study of the Scriptures always brings us to a sure conclusion. The Messiah is HaShem, the Davar/Word made flesh (Yochanan/John 1:14) our only Saviour and Redeemer (Yeshayhu/Isaiah 49:26).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the Rulemaker clearly stated that no natural man would suffice. &#8220;A brother does not redeem anyone at all, neither give to Elohim a ransom for him; for the redemption of their lives is costly, and it shall cease forever; that he should still live forever, and not see the Pit.&#8221;[Tehilla/Psalm 49:7-9] Careful study of the Scriptures always brings us to a sure conclusion. The Messiah is HaShem, the Davar/Word made flesh (Yochanan/John 1:14) our only Saviour and Redeemer (Yeshayhu/Isaiah 49:26).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Haley</title>
		<link>http://jerusalemcouncil.org/articles/apologetics/messianic-jewish-apologetics-virgin-birth/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Haley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerusalemcouncil.org/?p=822#comment-349</guid>
		<description>This question has perplexed me for some time.  When you start with the conclusion, looking back thru &quot;christianized theology&quot; it always ends up the same.  That, however, does not mean the conclusion is either exegetical or the truth.  Fact is, we do not know for sure.  The key is what has the Father accepted as the sacrifice. A natural man could have been received as the adequate sacrifice if the rulemaker said so.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This question has perplexed me for some time.  When you start with the conclusion, looking back thru &#8220;christianized theology&#8221; it always ends up the same.  That, however, does not mean the conclusion is either exegetical or the truth.  Fact is, we do not know for sure.  The key is what has the Father accepted as the sacrifice. A natural man could have been received as the adequate sacrifice if the rulemaker said so.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

